Industry Project – Global Homework Experts

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
1/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
STUDENT WRITTEN ASSESSMENT

order now
Business Unit/Work Group Business and Arts/BTHEM
Qualification Code CRS1400588
Qualification Title Bachelor of Tourism, Hospitality and Events Management
Subject Code/s National Code: CRS1400588
TAFE SA Code: AC00095
Subject Title/s Capstone: Industry Project
Assessment Title Assessment 2 – Conduct Research/Project (Goup)
Student Declaration By submitting this assessment, students hereby declare the material
submitted is their own work except where specifically acknowledged and
referenced.

 

Student guide for Written assessment
Overview of Assessment Each group will submit an essay to describe:
How the group is progressing with the planning of the project and
How objectives are being achieved by the group, based upon the
principles of project management.
Word count:
Report 1000 words – Group submission
Assessment Weighting:
20%
Task/s to be assessed Based upon the initial plan in assessment 1, describe the process
undertaken in the research, planning and proposed implementation of the
project.
Respond to each of the following points using the experience of working
with your group supported by a project management model from class
presentation or from your own group research.
What steps have been undertaken in the planning and
preparation of the project plan for implementation?
Describe the communication process between team members
and with stakeholders.
Describe how negotiation was used dealing with team members
and stakeholders.
What type of monitoring has been applied to ensure you will
meet timelines and stakeholder expectations?
Describe the role are you actively undertaking?
How has any conflict between team members and stakeholders
been managed?
To achieve a higher grade you may wish include a reference to
(optional):
How is the project ethically, legally, culturally and socially appropriate?
How does this project demonstrate a commitment to sustainability?
How could cross industry (tourism, hospitality and event management)
information assist with the successful completion of this project

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
2/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Student guide for Written assessment
Due Date Refer to subject learning guide and the assessment sections of the Learn
course for this subject
Assessment Submission Assessments must be uploaded to Learn course for the subject in the
appropriate section.
The first page of each assessment submission should include the
following information:
Student Name:
Student ID:
Subject Name
Assessment Name:
Word Count (if applicable)
Documents must be uploaded in PDF format (PDF unless otherwise
advised) and
file name of the document must include the following:
Student name
Student ID
Subject abbreviation
Assessment name
All written assessment tasks, unless otherwise stated, will require
students to follow these guidelines:
Typewritten using size 11 or 12 business like font
Line spacing: 1 ½ line spacing
Footers with:
o Student name and student ID
o Page numbers expressed as page 1 of X
For assessment to be graded a final assessment must be submitted via
Learn. Draft submissions will not be graded.
Decision making rules Grade for this assessment will be determined according to the marking
rubric located at the end of this document.
Assessment conditions All work must be original.
Students must meet the following subject learning outcomes (SLOs),
course learning outcomes (CLOs) and graduate attributes (GAs):
Subject Learning Outcomes
SLO4
Work collaboratively with others to complete the project/research.
Course Learning Outcomes
CLO1
Demonstrate in-depth knowledge of Management concepts,
models and theories
CLO2 Demonstrate in-depth knowledge of Management functions as
applied in the Hospitality, Tourism and Events industries
CLO3 Demonstrate in-depth and cross-industry knowledge of the
Hospitality, Tourism and Events industries.
CLO4 Analyse and solve problems or issues, articulate appropriate
solutions and justify propositions and/or professional decisions.
CLO5 Promote customer service excellence

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
3/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Student guide for Written assessment
CLO6 Create and maintain a network of industry connections.
Graduate Attributes
GA1: Knowledge and Application
GA1.1 Engage critically with a broad and coherent body of
knowledge
GA1.2 Apply knowledge to a professional context
GA1.3 Demonstrate an awareness of current research and
emerging technologies
GA2: Communication
GA2.1 Present a clear and logical explanation of knowledge and
ideas to others
GA2.2 Adapt and contextualise content to varying audiences to
enable them to communicate appropriately with professional
colleagues and the public
GA2.3 Proficiently use the oral, written, mathematical and visual
skills appropriate to the subject and audience
GA 3 Teamwork
GA3.1 Present a logical and rational case in negotiation with
others
GA3.2 Work collaboratively with different and diverse groups
GA3.3 Show respect to others and to their ideas and point of
view
GA 4 Problem Solving/Initiative and Enterprise
GA4.1 Critically analyse, evaluate and synthesise information to
develop solutions to problems and provide creative options to
address challenges
GA4.2 Identify areas of opportunity and formulate and
communicate plans to maximise these opportunities
GA4.3 Generate and communicate solutions to unpredictable
and sometimes complex problems
GA 5 Self-Management and Learning
GA5.1 Evaluate their own knowledge and skills capabilities and
identify ongoing professional development and learning needs
GA5.2 Maintain a contemporary and broad knowledge and skills
base through ongoing engagement with scholarship
GA5.3 Work in a self-directed manner responding to change in a
flexible and adaptable way
GA 6 Technology
GA6.1 Use contemporary technologies to manage, analyse,
consolidate, and communicate information as appropriate
GA6.2 Proficiently use professional technological tools
GA6.3 Demonstrate an awareness of emerging technologies and
applicability of these to professional practice
GA 7 Ethical, Cultural and Social Awareness
GA7.1 Demonstrate an awareness of ethical, cultural, legal and
social issues
GA7.2 Engage positively with people and ideas outside of their
own geographical, social, and cultural boundaries
GA7.3 Show a commitment to contemporary sustainable
practices
GA7.4 Recognise and protect intellectual property
GA7.5 Demonstrate a respect for their own safety and the safety
of others

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
4/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Student guide for Written assessment
This assessment is to be completed according to TAFE SA assessment
policy and procedures. Refer to the Higher Education Student Handbook
.
Resources required To complete this assessment, students should ensure they are familiar
with and able to apply subject content from Topic 2: Project
Implementation and Management
Students may use the recommended texts for this subject listed in the
subject guide, as well as other suitable academic sources. Students must
not rely on only web-based sources.
For additional resources to assist in assessment development please
refer to the Higher Education Student Handbook or TAFE SA libraries.
Results/Reassessment Students will be notified of assessment grades within 10 working days via
the Learn course page for the subject.
Feedback will be available on Learn and accessed by clicking on the
original upload link.
Please refer to the BTHEM Student Handbook located on the
BTHEM
Learn page
for further detail on assessment policies including:
Due dates
Extension of assessment due dates
Deferral
Non-submissions or non-attendance at exams
Penalties for late submission
Re-submission of assessment
Supplementary assessment
Hurdle requirements
Borderline subject fail

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
5/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM July 2020 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
THECAP701 ASSESSMENT 2 Report marking rubric

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Executive Summary
(15% of overall mark)
Summary of main
findings and
recommendations/
conclusions.
Has not included all aspects of
executive summary or summary
was poorly written.
No information on how findings
were sourced.
Conclusion and
recommendations not included or
partially included.
<7
Executive summary included
introduction to the topic,
some methods of analysis
and key findings. Has
attempted to summarise the
conclusion and
recommendations.
Has provided a brief
executive summary using
some formal language and
limited industry terminology.
(7 – 9)
Executive summary included the
subject matter, the majority of
methods of analysis and key
findings. Has summarised the
conclusion and most
recommendations.
Has provided an executive
summary using mostly formal
language and some industry
terminology.
(10)
Executive summary included
the subject matter, the
methods of analysis, key
findings, conclusions,
recommendations and any
limitations of the report.
Has provided a clear and
concise executive summary
using formal language and
industry terminology.
(11 – 12)
Executive summary included the
subject matter, the methods of
analysis, key findings, conclusions,
recommendations and any
limitations of the report.
Has provided a succinct and well
structured executive summary using
formal language and industry
terminology.
>13
/15
Key Findings and Analysis
(45% of overall mark)
Findings and facts
(evidence) to build and
support report criteria.
Includes analysis of
findings.
Comprises sections based
on key findings and
information, each focusing
separate findings.
• What steps have been
undertaken in the planning
and preparation of the
project plan for
implementation?
•Describe the
communication process
between team members
and with stakeholders.
•Describe how negotiation
was used dealing with
team members and
stakeholders.
Has failed to provide relevant
findings and evidence for all
report criteria.
The analysis fails to clearly
discuss all relevant aspects of
the report criteria and link to
relevant theories and/or
concepts.
Unable to link findings and
analysis to relevant industry
practices.
<23
Has provided relevant
findings and evidence for
most report criteria.
The analysis was discussed
with adequate ability to
identify and link relevant
theories and/or concepts
where appropriate.
Able to identify general links
to relevant industry
practices.
(23-29)
Has provided relevant findings
and evidence for all report
criteria.
The analysis was discussed
comprehensively and able to
identify and link relevant theories
and/or concepts where
appropriate.
Able to identify links to
contemporary relevant industry
practices.
(30-33)
Has provided relevant findings
from a variety of credible
sources showing evidence for
all report criteria.
The analysis was discussed
comprehensively and logically
connected to findings and has
clearly identified relevant links
to theories and/or concepts
where appropriate.
Able to identify links to
contemporary relevant
industry practices.
(34-38)
Has provided succinct and well
structured findings using a variety of
credible sources showing relevant
evidence for all report criteria.
The findings were critically analysed
with comprehensive and logical
connection to relevant theories
and/or concepts where appropriate.
Able to identify links to contemporary
relevant industry practices, providing
excellent examples throughout.
>38
/45

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
6/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM July 2020 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
•What type of monitoring
has been applied to
ensure you will meet
timelines and stakeholder
expectations?
•Describe the role are you
actively undertaking?
How has any conflict
between team members
and stakeholders been
managed?
Introduction and
Conclusion
(15% of overall mark)
Introduction to include
background information on
the report.
Conclusion to:
Summarises results
from findings.
Provides
recommendations
based on analysis.
Links to introduction of
report.
Background information is
insufficient to adequately
establish the topic context /
irrelevant / inaccurate / unclear.
Key terms are not defined or are
defined incorrectly.
There is no discernible outline of
the main ideas to be included
and analysed in the body or it is
unclear.
No discernible summary of the
main findings and analysis
presented, or it is poorly-defined.
No or poorly defined reference to
the connections between the
main ideas presented.
Insufficient or no logical
conclusions.
No or limited recommendations
provided.
No or an inadequate link/s to the
report ’s focus and the evidence
in the body of the report.
<7
Adequate introduction
establishes the topic but
lacks detail and /or many
information is irrelevant.
Only few key terms are
defined or defined clearly.
Definitions may lack
detail/accuracy.
Overall organisation of ideas
to be analysed in the body of
the report is fair; however,
many important ideas are
not included or not
expressed clearly.
Adequate summary of some
of the main findings and
analysis presented.
Adequate but limited
reference to the connections
between these ideas.
Limited conclusions that
demonstrate some links with
the report’s focus or the
evidence presented in the
key findings section.
Adequate introduction
establishes the topic but lacks
detail and /or some information
is irrelevant.
Many key terms are defined or
defined clearly. Definitions may
lack detail/accuracy.
Overall organisation of ideas to
be analysed in the body of the
report is adequate; however,
some important ideas are not
included or not expressed
clearly.
Reasonably structured, clear
summary of most of the main
findings and analysis presented.
Good attempt to have some
reference to the connections
between these ideas.
Logical but limited conclusions
that demonstrate adequate links
with the report’s focus or the
evidence presented in the key
findings section.
Sound recommendations
provided for most aspects of the
analysed findings.
Well-developed introduction.
Relevant background
information that clearly
establishes the topic context.
Accurate definition of key
terms.
Overall organisation of all
main ideas to be analysed in
the body of the report are
outlined.
Well structured, clear
summary of all main findings
and analysis presented and
most of the main connections
between them.
Logical conclusions that
demonstrate clear links with
the report’s focus and the
evidence in the body of the
key findings section.
Insightful recommendations
provided for all aspects of the
analysed findings.
(11 – 12)
Well-developed and highly engaging
introduction. Highly relevant
background information that clearly
establishes the topic context.
Accurate and detailed definition of
key terms.
Overall organisation of all main
ideas to be analysed in the body of
the report are precisely outlined.
Succinct / well-structured summary
of all the main findings and analysis
presented and the connections
between them.
Well considered, logical conclusions
that demonstrate clear and
compelling links with the report’s
focus and the evidence in the body
of the key findings.
Excellent recommendations
provided for all aspects of the
analysed findings incorporating
contemporary relevant industry
practices.
>13
/15

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
7/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM July 2020 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Basic recommendations
provided for most aspects of
the analysed findings.
(7 – 9)
(10)
Structure, grammar and
spelling (10% of overall
mark)
Insert details relevant to
type of assessment.
e.g.
Report structure includes:
Title page
Table of contents
Executive summary
Introduction
Key findings/ information
and analysis
Conclusion and
recommendations
Reference list
Appendices
Does not meet word limit.
Table of contents was not
included or was inaccurate.
Written work is not presented in
report structure.
Limited formatting or professional
appearance.
Poorly written using formal and
informal language
Constructed with minor to
significant errors in grammar,
spelling and punctuation.
<5
Meets word limit
requirements.
Table of contents was
included and mostly
accurate.
Written work is presented in
report structure.
Adequate level of formatting
and professional
appearance.
Written using limited formal
language and professional
terminology.
Constructed with numerous
errors in spelling punctuation
and grammar that inhibits
readability.
(5-6)
Meets word limit requirements.
Table of contents was included
and presented accurately.
Written work is logically
structured in report format to
create a cohesive piece of work.
Good level of formatting and
professional appearance.
The writing is of good standard
with use of academic language
and professional terminology.
Minor spelling, grammatical,
punctuation and typing errors.
(7)
Meets word limit requirements.
Table of contents was
included and presented
accurately.
The content has been logically
structured in report format to
create a cohesive analytical
piece of work.
Very good level of formatting
and professional appearance.
The writing is of a very good
standard with use of
consistent academic language
and professional terminology.
Does not have any, or very
few, spelling and/or
grammatical or typing errors.
(8-9)
Meets word limit requirements.
Table of contents was included and
presented accurately.
High quality report that is logically
and succinctly structured. A
coherent analytical piece of work
that seeks to lead reader through
report, with clearly defined sections.
Assigned format followed explicitly
with exceptional professional
appearance.
The writing is an excellent standard
using formal academic language.
Precise and correct discipline and
professional terminology is used to
clearly communicate meaning.
Does not have any spelling,
grammatical or typing errors
(10)
/10
Research and referencing
(15% of overall mark)
References are included
and correctly cited using
Harvard Referencing
Not used as part of the
word count.
Does not support findings and
analysis with relevant academic
evidence related to the report
criteria.
Relies too heavily one or two
references in body of work.
Literature from sources that are
not credible or relevant and/or
use of internet referenced
material only.
Conventions in both in-text
referencing and the reference list
is minimal or non-existent.
<7
Uses minimal number of
academic sources to support
findings and analysis.
Literature from a limited
range of sources has been
referred to throughout the
report and/or use of mostly
internet sources.
Conventions in both in- text
referencing and the
reference list has been
attempted but with errors
and inconsistencies.
(7 – 9)
Uses multiple number of
academic sources to support
findings and analysis.
Literature from academic
sources has been summarised
and incorporated, supporting key
points.
Internet references are
supported by other reference
material.
Conventions in both in- text
referencing and the reference
list are in evidence but there are
inconsistencies.
(10)
Uses multiple number of
academic sources to support
findings and analysis.
A variety of relevant literature
from academic sources has
been cited throughout the
body of work in supporting
arguments.
Conventions in both in-text
referencing and the reference
list has been used almost
always accurately and
consistently.
(11 – 12)
Uses multiple number of academic
sources including journal articles or
research papers to support findings
and analysis.
An extensive range of relevant
literature from academic sources
has been evaluated and cited
throughout body or work in
supporting arguments.
Conventions in both in-text
referencing and reference list has
been used accurately and
consistently.
>13
/15

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
8/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM July 2020 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Total /100
Late penalty (if applicable) %
Revised grade /100
Comments

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
9/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM July 2020 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
Penalties for late submission (as per BTHEM student handbook)
Example A
Original
Grade 70/100
Example B
Original
Grade 62/100
Example C
Original
Grade 56/100
1 5% 65% 57% 51%
2 10% 60% 52% 46%
3 15% 55% 47% 41%
4 20% 50% 42% 36%
5 25% 45% 37% 31%
6+
Assessment will
not be marked
0% 0% 0%
Days
Late
Late Submission
Penalty
Mark Awarded
Late penalty applied (if applicable)

Student Name
Student ID
Assessor Name
Date:

 

Original grade:
Number of days late: days
Penalty applied: %

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
10/10
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 2 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM July 2020 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
Final Assessment grade:

High Distinction (85-100%)
Distinction (75-84%)
Credit (65-74%)
Pass (50-64%)
Fail (0-49%)

 

Feedback to Student Refer to Learn for specific feedback on assessment

 

Comments are closed.