Industry Project Plan – Global Homework Experts

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
1/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
STUDENT WRITTEN ASSESSMENT

order now
Business Unit/Work Group Business and Arts/BTHEM
Qualification Code CRS1400588
Qualification Title Bachelor of Tourism, Hospitality and Events Management
Subject Code/s National Code: THECAP701
TAFE SA Code: SABLN
Subject Title/s Capstone: Industry Project
Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Industry Project Plan (Group)
Student Declaration By submitting this assessment, students hereby declare the material
submitted is their own work except where specifically acknowledged and
referenced.

 

Student guide for Written assessment
Overview of Assessment The objective of this assessment is for students to negotiate and prepare
a project plan to evaluate an issue, problem or requirement within the
management process (or part of the process) of a tourism, hospitality or
events related organisation. Students will also need to design an
evaluation tool as part of the project plan. This project plan will then form
the base of research, finding analysis, recommendations, and outcomes
to be provided by students within assessments 2, 3 and 4.
This is a group assessment with a maximum of four (4) students per
group) presented in a proposal format, covering elements such as the
objectives of the proposal, roles/responsibilities of each team member,
resources required, timeframes etc. and the phases of a project as
described in Topic 1.
Students must demonstrate knowledge and skills to:
Negotiate a project in consultation with workplace/industry or
based on an industry issue, problem or requirement (SLO1).
Develop a project plan in consultation with stakeholders (SLO2).
Design an evaluation tool for the project in consultation with
stakeholders (SLO3).
Word count: 1000 words – 1 group submission
Assessment Weighting: 20%
Task/s to be assessed This is a group assessment with a maximum of four (4) students per
group and must be in the students’ own words.
As a group, identify and negotiate a project for an organisation operating
within the tourism, hospitality or events (THE) related industries. The
project must relate to a current issue or challenge within their
management process.
This organisation may be from:
a current workplace

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
2/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Student guide for Written assessment
a meeting with a current tourism, hospitality or events industry
contact who may need or suggest a project
current research into current issues within the tourism, hospitality or
events industries
You will need to communicate your choice to your lecturer to gain
approval of the project choice.
Once your group has chosen a project and your lecturer has
approved it, your group will need to create a project plan (essay
style) that will explain the following:
short overview of the chosen organisation
details of the project
a project plan for this project (based on your learning from topic 1).
a basic evaluation tool of the project
o can be an appendix and will not be part of the word count.
o This evaluation tool must be based on your own research,
must align with the project you are undertaking, and be
shared with your lecturer/industry contact for feedback and
approval before selection.
o If you are working with industry there should be a component
for industry feedback within your evaluation tool.
o If you are not working directly with industry, the lecturer will
be your key stakeholder and will provide project evaluation in
assessment 3.
Further points you may consider including within your project plan:
How is the project ethically, legally, culturally and socially
appropriate?
How does this project demonstrate a commitment to sustainability?
How could cross industry (tourism, hospitality and event
management) information assist with the successful completion of
this project?
You must include in-text references as well as a reference list using
Harvard Author Date System.
Please note that you must ensure that
all the personal (phone or face to face) and electronic contact with
industry used for this project are acknowledged in referencing (both
in-text and in the reference list)
.
This assessment will become your initial brief and focus in moving
forward to undertake your research/project and presentation in
assessments 2, 3 and 4.
Due Date Refer to subject guide and assessment section of the Learn course for
this subject.

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
3/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Student guide for Written assessment
Assessment Submission Assessments must be uploaded to Learn course for the subject in the
appropriate section.
The first page of each assessment submission should include the
following information:
Student Name:
Student ID:
Subject Name
Assessment Name:
Word Count (if applicable)
Documents must be uploaded in PDF format (PDF unless otherwise
advised) and
file name of the document must include the following:
Student name
Student ID
Subject abbreviation
Assessment name
All written assessment tasks, unless otherwise stated, will require
students to follow these guidelines:
Typewritten using size 11 or 12 business like font
Line spacing: 1 ½ line spacing
Footers with:
o Student name and student ID
o Page numbers expressed as page 1 of X
For assessment to be graded a final assessment must be submitted via
Learn. Draft submissions will not be graded.
Decision making rules Grade for this assessment will be determined according to the marking
rubric located at the end of this document.
Assessment conditions All work must be original.
Students must meet the following subject learning outcomes (SLOs),
course learning outcomes (CLOs) and graduate attributes (GAs):
Subject Learning Outcomes
SLO1
Negotiate a project in consultation with workplace/industry or
based on an industry issue, problem or requirement.
SLO2 Develop a project plan in consultation with stakeholders.
SLO3 Design an evaluation tool for the project in consultation with
stakeholders
Course Learning Outcomes
CLO1
Demonstrate in-depth knowledge of Management concepts,
models and theories
CLO2 Demonstrate in-depth knowledge of Management functions as
applied in the Hospitality, Tourism and Events industries
CLO3 Demonstrate in-depth and cross-industry knowledge of the
Hospitality, Tourism and Events industries.
Graduate Attributes
GA1: Knowledge and Application
GA1.2 Apply knowledge to a professional context

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
4/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Student guide for Written assessment
GA1.3 Demonstrate an awareness of current research and emerging
technologies
GA2: Communication
GA2.1 Present a clear and logical explanation of knowledge and ideas to
others
GA2.2 Adapt and contextualise content to varying audiences to enable
them to communicate appropriately with professional colleagues and the
public
GA2.3 Proficiently use the oral, written, mathematical and visual skills
appropriate to the subject and audience
GA 3 Teamwork
GA3.1 Present a logical and rational case in negotiation with others
GA 4 Problem Solving/Initiative and Enterprise
GA4.1 Critically analyse, evaluate and synthesise information to develop
solutions to problems and provide creative options to address challenges
GA4.2 Identify areas of opportunity and formulate and communicate
plans to maximise these opportunities
GA4.3 Generate and communicate solutions to unpredictable and
sometimes complex problems
GA 6 Technology
GA6.1 Use contemporary technologies to manage, analyse, consolidate,
and communicate information as appropriate
GA6.2 Proficiently use professional technological tools
GA6.3 Demonstrate an awareness of emerging technologies and
applicability of these to professional practice
GA 7 Ethical, Cultural and Social Awareness
GA7.1 Demonstrate an awareness of ethical, cultural, legal and social
issues
GA7.2 Engage positively with people and ideas outside of their own
geographical, social, and cultural boundaries
GA7.3 Show a commitment to contemporary sustainable practices
GA7.4 Recognise and protect intellectual property
GA7.5 Demonstrate a respect for their own safety and the safety of
others
This assessment is to be completed according to TAFE SA assessment
policy and procedures. Refer to the Higher Education Student Handbook
Resources required To complete this assessment, students should ensure they are familiar
with and able to apply subject content from Topic 1: Project Planning.
Students may use the recommended texts for this subject listed in the
subject guide, as well as other suitable academic sources. Students must
not rely on only web-based sources.
For additional resources to assist in assessment development please refer
to the Higher Education Student Handbook or TAFE SA libraries.
Results/Assessment policy Students will be notified of assessment grades within 10 working days via
the Learn course page for the subject.

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
5/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Student guide for Written assessment
Feedback will be available on Learn and accessed by clicking on the
original upload link.
Please refer to the BTHEM Student Handbook located on the
BTHEM
Learn page
for further detail on assessment policies including:
Due dates
Extension of assessment due dates
Deferral
Non-submissions or non-attendance at exams
Penalties for late submission
Re-submission of assessment
Supplementary assessment
Hurdle requirements
Borderline subject fail

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
6/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
ASSESSMENT 1 PROPOSAL MARKING RUBRIC

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Introduction
(10% of overall mark)
short overview of the
chosen organisation
details of the project
To provide background
information, scope and define
terms.
Background information is
insufficient to adequately
establish the topic context /
irrelevant / inaccurate /
unclear.
Key terms are not defined
or are defined incorrectly.
There is no discernible
outline of the main ideas to
be included and analysed
in the body or it is unclear.
<5
Adequate introduction
establishes the topic but
lacks detail and /or many
information is irrelevant.
Only few key terms are
defined or defined clearly.
Definitions may lack
detail/accuracy.
Overall organisation of ideas
to be analysed in the body of
the essay is fair; however,
many important ideas are
not included or not
expressed clearly.
(5-6)
Adequate introduction
establishes the topic but lacks
detail and /or some
information is irrelevant.
Many key terms are defined
or defined clearly. Definitions
may lack detail/accuracy.
Overall organisation of ideas
to be analysed in the body of
the essay is adequate;
however, some important
ideas are not included or not
expressed clearly.
(7)
Well-developed introduction.
Relevant background
information that clearly
establishes the topic context.
Accurate definition of key
terms.
Overall organisation of all
main ideas to be analysed in
the body of the essay are
outlined.
(8-9)
Well-developed and highly engaging
introduction. Highly relevant
background information that clearly
establishes the topic context.
Accurate and detailed definition of key
terms.
Overall organisation of all main ideas
to be analysed in the body of the
essay are precisely outlined.
(10)
/10
Proposal (Body)
(55% of overall mark)
Covers elements such as the
objectives of the proposal,
roles/responsibilities of each
team member, resources
required, timeframes etc. and
the phases of a project as
described in the curriculum
Comprises several
paragraphs, each focusing on
one discussion topic.
Group project plan must
include:
details the project elements
above
a project plan for this project
(based learning from
session 1).
Does not demonstrate a
clear understanding of the
theories and/or concepts.
Unable to link relevant
theories and/or concepts to
appropriate issues in the
chosen topic.
Does not respond to all
points assessment criteria
and/or discussion topics.
Examples, reasons and
evidence are not relevant
or description of them is
unclear. Their relationship
to the argument unclear.
Unable to link theories
and/or concepts to relevant
industry practices.
<27
Demonstrates a basic
understanding of the
theories and/or concepts.
Link relevant theories and/or
concepts to appropriate
issues in the chosen topic.
Responds to all discussion
topics, some aspects in
more detail than others.
Examples, reasons and
evidence are given however,
meaning in relation to the
argument may not have
been established.
Able to identify general links
to relevant industry
practices.
(28-35)
Demonstrates a good
understanding of the theories
and/or concepts with sound
explanation.
Able to correctly identify and
link relevant theories and/or
concepts to appropriate
issues in the chosen topic and
consider some implications.
Responds to all discussion
topics, attempts to give equal
weight.
Examples, reasons and
evidence are relevant, and
their meaning is related to the
argument.
Able to identify links to
contemporary relevant
industry practices.
(36-40)
Demonstrates understanding
of multiple theories and/or
concepts. Able to clearly
articulate and identify key
aspects.
Able to correctly identify and
link multiple theories and/or
concepts to appropriate issues
in the chosen topic and
consider relevant implications.
Responds to all discussion
topics equally.
Examples, reasons and
evidence are relevant, and
their meaning is integrated
within the argument.
Able to identify links to
contemporary relevant
industry practices, providing
relevant examples.
(41-46)
Excellent understanding of multiple
theories and/or concepts. Able to
clearly articulate and identify key
aspects.
Well defined argument linking multiple
theories and/or concepts to
appropriate issues in the chosen topic
and thorough consideration of relevant
implications.
Responds to all discussion topics
equally using precise and correct
discipline and professional
terminology.
Examples, reasons and evidence are
relevant, and their meaning is
succinctly and critically integrated
within the argument.
Able to identify links to contemporary
relevant industry practices, providing
excellent examples throughout.
>47
/55

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
7/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
an example of an evaluation
tool to be used at the end of
the project.
For a higher grade, Group
project plan may include:
How the project is ethically,
legally, culturally and
socially appropriate.
How this project
demonstrates a
commitment to sustainability
How cross industry
(tourism, hospitality and
event management)
information can assist with
the successful completion of
this project
Conclusion
(10% of overall mark)
Develops a workable schedule
and budget for assigning
resources to the activities
required to complete the
project.
Finalises the main points of
the proposal
No discernible summary of
the main discussion topics
presented, or it is poorly
defined.
No or poorly defined
reference to the
connections between the
main ideas presented.
Insufficient or no logical
conclusions.
No or an inadequate link/s
to the essay’s focus and
the evidence in the body of
the essay.
<5
Adequate summary of some
of the main discussion topics
presented.
Adequate but limited
reference to the connections
between these ideas.
Limited conclusions that
demonstrate some links with
the essay’s focus or the
evidence presented in the
body of the essay.
(5-6)
Reasonably structured, clear
summary of most of the main
discussion topics presented.
Good attempt to have some
reference to the connections
between these ideas.
Logical but limited
conclusions that demonstrate
adequate but limited links with
the essay’s focus or the
evidence presented in the
body of the essay.
(7)
Well structured, clear
summary of most main
discussion topics presented
and most of the main
connections between them.
Logical conclusions that
demonstrate clear links with
the essay’s focus and the
evidence in the body of the
essay.
(8-9)
Succinct / well-structured summary of
all the main discussion topics
presented and the connections
between them.
Well considered, logical conclusions
that demonstrate clear and compelling
links with the essay’s focus and the
evidence in the body of the essay.
(10)
/10
Structure, grammar and
spelling (10% of overall mark)
Word count: 1000
Essay Includes:
Introduction (10% of word
count)
Body (80% of word count)
Does not meet word limit
Written work is not
presented in essay
structure.
Limited formatting or
professional appearance.
Poorly written using formal
and informal language
Meets word limit
requirements
Written work is presented in
essay structure.
Adequate level of formatting
and professional
appearance.
Meets word limit requirements
Written work is logically
structured in essay structure
to create a cohesive piece of
work.
Good level of formatting and
professional appearance.
Meets word limit requirements
The content has been logically
structured to create a cohesive
analytical piece of work.
Very good level of formatting
and professional appearance.
The writing is of a very good
standard with use of
Meets word limit requirements
High quality essay that is logically and
succinctly structured. A coherent
analytical piece of work that seeks to
lead reader through flow of ideas, with
clearly defined introduction and well
rounded conclusion.
/10

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
8/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM May 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B

Criteria Poor Adequate Good Very good Excellent Marks
Conclusion (10% of word
count)
Constructed with minor to
significant errors in
grammar, spelling and
punctuation.
<5
Written using limited formal
language and professional
terminology.
Constructed with numerous
errors in spelling punctuation
and grammar that inhibits
readability.
(5-6)
The writing is of good
standard with use of
academic language and
professional terminology.
Minor spelling, grammatical,
punctuation and typing errors.
(7)
consistent academic language
and professional terminology.
Does not have any, or very
few, spelling and/or
grammatical or typing errors.
(8-9)
Assigned format followed explicitly
with exceptional professional
appearance.
The writing is of an excellent standard
using formal academic language.
Precise and correct discipline and
professional terminology is used to
clearly communicate meaning.
Does not have any spelling and/or
grammatical or typing errors
(10)
Research and referencing
(15% of overall mark)
References are included and
correctly cited using Harvard
Referencing.
Communication with industry
contact is referenced if
applicable.
Not used as part of the word
count.
Does not support
development of arguments
with relevant academic
evidence related to the
topic.
Relies too heavily one or
two references in body of
work.
Literature from sources
that are not credible or
relevant and/or use of
internet referenced
material only.
Conventions in both in-text
referencing and the
reference list is minimal or
non-existent.
<7
Uses minimal number of
academic sources to support
argument.
Literature from a limited
range of sources has been
referred to throughout the
essay and/or use of mostly
internet sources.
Conventions in both in- text
referencing and the
reference list has been
attempted but with errors
and inconsistencies.
(7 – 9)
Uses multiple number of
academic sources to support
analysis.
Literature from academic
sources has been
summarised and
incorporated, supporting key
points.
Internet references are
supported by other reference
material.
Conventions in both in- text
referencing and the reference
list are in evidence but there
are inconsistencies.
(10)
Uses multiple number of
academic sources to support
analysis.
A variety of relevant literature
from academic sources has
been cited throughout the
body of work in supporting
arguments.
Conventions in both in-text
referencing and the reference
list has been used almost
always accurately and
consistently.
(11 – 12)
Uses multiple number of academic
sources including journal articles or
research papers to support analysis.
An extensive range of relevant
literature from academic sources has
been evaluated and cited throughout
body or work in supporting arguments.
Conventions in both in-text referencing
and reference list has been used
accurately and consistently.
>13
/15
Total /100
Late penalty (if applicable) %
Revised grade /100
Comments

TAFE SA HIGHER EDUCATION
9/9
TAFE SA Student Written Assessment 1 ©TAFE SA
THECAP701 Capstone: Industry Project | CRS1400588 BTHEM February 2021 RTO CODE 41026 | CRICOS 00092B
ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
Penalties for late submission (as per BTHEM student handbook)
Example A
Original
Grade 70/100
Example B
Original
Grade 62/100
Example C
Original
Grade 56/100
1 5% 65% 57% 51%
2 10% 60% 52% 46%
3 15% 55% 47% 41%
4 20% 50% 42% 36%
5 25% 45% 37% 31%
6+
Assessment will
not be marked
0% 0% 0%
Days
Late
Late Submission
Penalty
Mark Awarded
Late penalty applied (if applicable)
Final Assessment grade:

High Distinction (85-100%)
Distinction (75-84%)
Credit (65-74%)
Pass (50-64%)
Fail (0-49%)

 

Feedback to Student Refer to Learn for specific feedback on assessment

 

Student Name
Student ID
Assessor Name
Date:

 

Original grade:
Number of days late: days
Penalty applied: %

 

Comments are closed.