Public Health Protection and Control – Global Homework Experts

Public Health Protection and Control PUBH6030
Marking Rubric – Risk Assessment Assignment, Value 40%

order now
Criteria and Possible Marks Proficient
>80%
Competent
70 -79%
Advanced Beginner
60 -69%
Novice
Below 60%
Issue identification (8 marks)
Provide clear evidence that
exposure to the selected hazard is
a public health concern in your
selected setting
6.4 – 8.0 5.6 – 6.3 4.8 – 5.5 0 – 4.7
Comprehensive presentation of
quality evidence to support the
issue is a significant public
health concern.
Adequate evidence to support a
public health concern, but quality
and range of evidence could be
improved.
Quality and type of evidence is
too general and omits key aspects
especially related to the setting.
Minimal attention to the context of
the setting that fails to provide
strong evidence of a public health
issue.
Hazard assessment (10 marks)
Summarise the key evidence for
health effects of your selected
hazard/setting and the relationship
between dose and response
8.0 – 10.0 7.0 – 7.9 6.0 – 6.9 0 – 5.9
Thorough and concise
presentation of the range of
critical health outcomes and
dose-response relationship.
Adequate coverage but some
gaps in terms of health outcomes
&/or dose-response relationship
Range of key health impacts for
chosen setting is incomplete &/or
discussion of dose-response
relationship is lacking in detail.
Critical health impacts are
overlooked &/or discussion of
dose-response relationship is weak.
Exposure assessment (8 marks)
Describe the key sources, exposure
patterns and routes, and how
exposure could be measured.
Identify population groups who are
likely to be exposed, including any
susceptible groups.
6.4 – 8.0 5.6 – 6.3 4.8 – 5.5 0 – 4.7
All aspects of exposure
assessment are well-covered
and supported by high quality
evidence.
Most, but not all aspects of
exposure assessment are
discussed and supported by high
quality evidence.
General understanding of
exposure assessment, however
connection to chosen topic is not
strong &/or evidence is weak.
Understanding of the key concepts
of exposure assessment and
discussion of susceptible groups is
lacking.
Risk Management (10 marks)
Identify key management
strategies to reduce the public
health risk in this setting. Integrate
a discussion of sensitive groups and
identify any guidelines or standards
for the hazard that need to be met.
8.0 – 10.0 7.0 – 7.9 6.0 – 6.9 0 – 5.9
Strong justification of the
selection of strategies relevant
to the setting, including a clear
demonstration that sensitive
groups and relevant standards
have been considered.
Topic covered well, but key
strategies are absent, rationale
for strategies needs improving or
sensitive groups are not covered
in adequate detail, especially in
the context of the chosen setting.
Broad coverage of strategies and
sensitive groups, however
rationale in the context of the
chosen setting is poor.
Critical management strategies are
absent and coverage of sensitive
groups is poorly done.
Overall structure, quality of
writing and referencing (4 marks)
3.2 – 4.0 2.8 – 3.1 2.4 – 3.0 0 – 2.3
Clear, concise language,
sequence is logical, ideas flow
Free of typographical and/or
grammatical errors References
are appropriately cited
Generally clear, sequence of
information is logical, ideas flow
most of the time. Mostly free of
typographical and/or
grammatical errors Mostly
references are cited appropriate
Sequence demonstrates some
inconsistencies and/or ideas are
scattered. Numerous
typographical and/or
grammatical errors. Reference
citations and formatting needs
review.
Inconsistent presentation of
evidence and ideas are scattered or
absent. Uses language that
impedes meaning because of errors
in usage. Reference citations and
formatting needs review.

 

Comments are closed.